Comparison
Telenow vs Decagon
Decagon builds enterprise-grade AI agents for customer support, with a high-touch, deeply integrated approach for large CX organizations. For big support teams that want a tailored, managed deployment, that focus is a strength. Telenow serves a broader, self-serve audience — voice and chat agents you can spin up yourself — with bring-your-own flexibility and transparent pricing rather than an enterprise-only engagement.
Decagon is best for: Large enterprises wanting a tailored CX support-agent deployment.
The Telenow edge
Where Telenow stands out
Self-serve onboarding — no required enterprise sales cycle to start
Bring your own LLM, agentic backend and carrier with no lock-in
Transparent, itemized component-level pricing
Built-in numbers, dialer and outbound campaigns for proactive voice
Feature by feature
Side-by-side
| Capability | Telenow | Decagon |
|---|---|---|
| Bring your own LLM (OpenAI-compatible) | Yes | Varies |
| Bring your own agentic backend (Custom API) | Yes | Varies |
| Bring your own carrier (Plivo / Twilio) | Yes | Limited |
| Transparent component-level pricing | Yes | Enterprise only |
| Built-in phone numbers + compliance | Yes | Varies |
| Softphone dialer + outbound campaigns | Yes | Limited |
| Knowledge base (RAG) included | Yes | Yes |
| No-code builder AND full REST API | Yes | Limited |
| Self-serve onboarding | Yes | Enterprise only |
Positioning is capability-level and may change as products evolve. Evaluating Decagon? Try Telenow side-by-side.
Ready to compare
See Telenow on your use case
A 30-minute demo, or jump into the live sandbox.